Chaucer’s “The Miller’s Tale” as a Parody of Courtly Love Essay

A char is a creature to be handle like an angel of God. She is beautiful, honorable, and chaste. The sanctity of a cleaning lady is non only charge fighting for, it is worth dying for. Her g grapple on plate send off is a harmonious battle cry, a need both formidable and divine. Always painfully veracious and never chastely compromised, she is the embodiment of neareousness. I shall sack out her from afar, as she pull up stakes love me back. Never entrust our love come to physical fruition it is to a greater extent holy than that. Her, as well as my, trade union is beneath our love, our love of admiration and complete devotion. She will swoon for me as I shall fight for her, and our inspirit argon forever intertwined. Physical love and lewd temptation are too worldly for us.These would be the thoughts of any proper knight toward his lady. The Millers Tale is a satire of courtly love and its actuality in times contemporary the setting of The Canterbury Tales. The chara cters Alison, Absalon, and Nicholas are exacerbated examples of the degradation of courtly love that happened in chivalric times, a direct result of mans inclination to indulge in earthly pleasure.Alison does pity to the notion of courtly love. She personifies deceit, infidelity, and moral perversion. Toward the object of what mustiness be her courtly love, as she was married originally ever encountering him, she extends promise of physical date so far as to the point of sex. She deceives her husband so that she can philander with John, who she should be the object of her worship, not her lust. She is the complete opposite of the morally upright woman she should, and her courtly love for John is little more(prenominal) than indulgence in sin. Also, in her dealings with her early(a) pursuer Absalon, she looked upon him as her private ape.As a lady she should waste been proper and at to the lowest story civil in her dealings with him, yet she treat him like a puppet. She ha d no care for his sensation or his well being. When Absalon asked for a kiss from her, instead of persisting that he treat her as a lady and love her from afar, she had him kiss her rear. A lady should never act in such a manner. Her actions are so perverse that by her traits integrity would think her one and the same as the miller telling this story.Absalon, unrequited lover of Alison, is not free of sin himself. He too doesshame to the imagination of courtly love. alternatively than love her in a holy, worshipping manner, he chases her pruriently, if she had been a mouse and he a cat, shed have been pounced upon. If he had been pure and morally strong, he would have love her like a knight, chastely, without any physical desire.Nicholas, like Absalon, loves his lady heatedly rather than worshipfully. If Nicholas had been a true man, he would have loved her as an angel, his lady on high. Her peach should have been his strength, but it was his passion. He carried on an famil iarity with the wife of his landlord, the woman who should have been his object of Christian affection. Instead of wearing a piece of her garment as a reminder to do right, he stroked her loins a bit and kissed her sweetly.Chaucers inclination for creating such morally deranged characters is to illustrate the degree to which courtly love had become just a synonym for physical lust. The reason for this tale is to steer that extramarital affairs are only an engagement in immorality, especially if the affair be downstairs the guise of holy love. As men, Absalon and Nicholas should have loved Alison with the love of highest admiration, and she should have loved them the same way. Rather than love each other in the right fashion, they succumbed to physical temptation, and thus were morally devoid characters. A woman is an angel, not an object of lust.